Monday at 12:44 AM3 days .NET Reactor v7.5.9.1 (Aggressive Settings + Custom Anti-Tamper) Hey everyone,I put together a small challenge for anyone interested in reversing .NET protections. This one is packed using .NET Reactor v7.5.9.1 with some pretty aggressive settings, along with a bit of custom anti-tamper logic on top.Your goal is to unpack the application and recover a clean, working assembly. Protections EnabledNecroBitString EncryptionObfuscationAnti ILDASMHide Method CallsCode VirtualizationAnti TamperingAnti DebugMerge EnumsControl Flow Obfuscation (Level 9) Additional ProtectionsCustom runtime anti-debugAnti-injection checksIntegrity verificationA background watchdog thread🎯 Objectives1. Primary: Unpack the application and produce a clean assembly that runs without errors2. Bonus: Recover the correct password (completely optional) File Information Submitter Visual Studio Submitted 04/13/2026 Category UnPackMe (.NET) View File
Monday at 09:53 AM3 days Does .NET Reactor 7.5.9.1 exist in the world? Seems the latest is 7.5 : https://www.eziriz.com/reactor_download.htm
Monday at 10:40 PM2 days Author 12 hours ago, CreateAndInject said:Does .NET Reactor 7.5.9.1 exist in the world? Seems the latest is 7.5 : https://www.eziriz.com/reactor_download.htmSure does.
Tuesday at 12:15 AM2 days 1 hour ago, Visual Studio said:Sure does.Hello, could you please share the installation package? please...thank you
Tuesday at 12:29 AM2 days Author 13 minutes ago, cjhrb said:Hello, could you please share the installation package?please...thank youI am sorry, I can't as its not public yet. Don't want anything coming back on me.
Tuesday at 12:43 AM2 days 14 minutes ago, Visual Studio said:I am sorry, I can't as its not public yet. Don't want anything coming back on me.ok , I am so sorry to bather you.thank you .
Tuesday at 07:19 PM1 day Took a quick look, didn’t dive too deep yet.Already managed to expose part of the check (PBKDF2 → AES → "UNPACKED"), so it’s not as opaque as it first looks.This kind of protection layer is also something I’ve been dealing with in my own work:https://forum.tuts4you.com/topic/46002-continuation-fork-krypton-net-reactor-devirtualizer/#comment-229109No full unpack yet, just a quick peek for now.
Tuesday at 10:48 PM1 day Author 3 hours ago, dawwinci said:Took a quick look, didn’t dive too deep yet.Already managed to expose part of the check (PBKDF2 → AES → "UNPACKED"), so it’s not as opaque as it first looks.This kind of protection layer is also something I’ve been dealing with in my own work:https://forum.tuts4you.com/topic/46002-continuation-fork-krypton-net-reactor-devirtualizer/#comment-229109No full unpack yet, just a quick peek for now.Well done :) I can create some more challenges for you if you'd like, I also have Intellilock
Yesterday at 07:49 AM1 day along with a bit of custom anti-tamper logic on top@Visual Studio How do you add custom anti-tamper? Can we add custom anti-tamper on .net reactor 7.5? Edited yesterday at 07:51 AM1 day by CreateAndInject
Yesterday at 11:05 AM1 day Author 3 hours ago, CreateAndInject said:@Visual Studio How do you add custom anti-tamper? Can we add custom anti-tamper on .net reactor 7.5?If its not on the build you're using, I am assuming its coming in the near future.
Yesterday at 11:42 AM1 day 34 minutes ago, Visual Studio said:If its not on the build you're using, I am assuming its coming in the near future.What do you mean? Can you show some screenshot how do you add custom anti-tamper?The difference I can see is: The anti-tamper method is called by EntryPoint in your target, but it's called by <Module>::.cctor in standard .NET Reactor.
23 hours ago23 hr 18 hours ago, Visual Studio said:Well done :) I can create some more challenges for you if you'd like, I also have Intellilock Okey, it would be nice to share more similar challenges, this one was really interesting.
Create an account or sign in to comment