alorent Posted December 8, 2023 Share Posted December 8, 2023 Holly cow, "intel.cc" is already encrypted! What a spaghetti code! 😅 Link to comment
jackyjask Posted December 8, 2023 Share Posted December 8, 2023 (edited) are we still missing arm.cc ?... Edited December 8, 2023 by jackyjask Link to comment
BlackHat Posted December 8, 2023 Share Posted December 8, 2023 20 hours ago, kao said: @RADIOX: I don't have access to Baidu, so I can't check that. Based on the timing, I guess it might be the same. I can access baidu... downloaded from baidu and uploaded -- aHR0cHM6Ly93b3JrdXBsb2FkLmNvbS9maWxlLzJhQlFxbmtITW5j 1 Link to comment
kao Posted December 8, 2023 Author Share Posted December 8, 2023 (edited) 1 hour ago, jackyjask said: are we still missing arm.cc ?... I don't think so. "arm.cc" is only referenced by a project "test1.vcxproj" which seems to be a simple unit test. 2 minutes ago, BlackHat said: downloaded from baidu and uploaded Yes, that archive contains the same files as the github repo. Edited December 8, 2023 by kao Link to comment
jackyjask Posted December 8, 2023 Share Posted December 8, 2023 Good catch it means VMP is not capable (yet?) of protecting ARM? Link to comment
boot Posted December 13, 2023 Share Posted December 13, 2023 Some files are still missing, but these do not affect compilation... Missing: arm.cc, arm.h, gcc-demangle.cc, gcc-demangle.h, msvc-demangle.cc, msvc-demangle.h, dprint.c, dprint.h, def.h 1 Link to comment
Sean Park - Lovejoy Posted December 13, 2023 Share Posted December 13, 2023 19 minutes ago, boot said: Some files are still missing, but these do not affect compilation... Missing: arm.cc, arm.h, gcc-demangle.cc, gcc-demangle.h, msvc-demangle.cc, msvc-demangle.h, dprint.c, dprint.h, def.h @boot why is the vmprotect's version that you built of being "VMProtect Ultimate v 1.0.0" ? Link to comment
boot Posted December 13, 2023 Share Posted December 13, 2023 54 minutes ago, windowbase said: why is the vmprotect's version that you built of being "VMProtect Ultimate v 1.0.0" ? These seem to be related to some *.h files generated after running "res. bat" and "version. bat" scripts... The actual version should be [3.5.x~3.6.x). 1 Link to comment
Sean Park - Lovejoy Posted December 13, 2023 Share Posted December 13, 2023 25 minutes ago, boot said: These seem to be related to some *.h files generated after running "res. bat" and "version. bat" scripts... The actual version should be [3.5.x~3.6.x). Quote These seem to be related to some *.h files generated after running "res. bat" and "version. bat" scripts... The actual version should be [3.5.x~3.6.x). Thanks for the comment. Regards. sean. 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now