Jump to content
Tuts 4 You

Unpack me :D


TechX

Recommended Posts

Difficulty : 8/10
Language : C#
Platform : Windows
OS Version : All (Requires .net 4.0)
Packer / Protector : Crypto

Description:

Unpack the file, clean the code and keep the application working.

and make a Short Tut for it.

ScreenShot:

pUEdCrM.jpg.46766fce6ce8eff76193c4d60d1cff54.jpg

Download Links https://hostr.co/4PgLTKiSB2Ms

AntiCrash.rar

Edited by Teddy Rogers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Teddy Rogers

You will need to attach the file to the topic and format the text as per the examples shown, before this will be approved...

Ted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Teddy Rogers said:

You will need to attach the file to the topic and format the text as per the examples shown, before this will be approved...

Ted.

How to Edit lol i cant see the "edit" here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Teddy Rogers

Your edit time expired, I have done the work for you. Please follow the guidelines in future, thank you...

Ted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unpack? This isn't really obfuscated at all outside of method names. The flow of the program is still all there and easily readable. The file loads, decrypts a resource which contains some basic strings. The main string showing config.txt being a file (which is missing in your rar) trying to be read. The file format is:

array[0] = ?
array[1] = ?
array[2] = IP (local listen)
array[3] = Port (local listen)
array[4] = IP (remote connect)
array[5] = Port (remote connect)
array[6] = ?

Each of these on their own line. This looks like beginning stages of a shitty RAT program. Given that you claim this a 'crypto' I'm going to assume you are from HackForums and want people to test how 'leet' and 'secure' your crappy crypto for a rat is. Garbage like this should not be posted on this site.

Edit - here is the resource decrypted in a readable format since it was 'packed' via a binary writer:

jPowVEC.png

Edited by atom0s
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Unpack? This isn't really obfuscated at all outside of method names. The flow of the program is still all there and easily readable. The file loads, decrypts a resource which contains some basic strings. The main string showing config.txt being a file (which is missing in your rar) trying to be read. The file format is:

array[0] = ?
array[1] = ?
array[2] = IP (local listen)
array[3] = Port (local listen)
array[4] = IP (remote connect)
array[5] = Port (remote connect)
array[6] = ?

Each of these on their own line. This looks like beginning stages of a shitty RAT program. Given that you claim this a 'crypto' I'm going to assume you are from HackForums and want people to test how 'leet' and 'secure' your crappy crypto for a rat is. Garbage like this should not be posted on this site.

Edit - here is the resource decrypted in a readable format since it was 'packed' via a binary writer:

jPowVEC.png

Its not a Rat man lol its a gateway to avoid crashing my server :D but thank you for answer :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MindSystem
 

Unpack? This isn't really obfuscated at all outside of method names. The flow of the program is still all there and easily readable. The file loads, decrypts a resource which contains some basic strings. The main string showing config.txt being a file (which is missing in your rar) trying to be read. The file format is:

array[0] = ?
array[1] = ?
array[2] = IP (local listen)
array[3] = Port (local listen)
array[4] = IP (remote connect)
array[5] = Port (remote connect)
array[6] = ?

Each of these on their own line. This looks like beginning stages of a shitty RAT program. Given that you claim this a 'crypto' I'm going to assume you are from HackForums and want people to test how 'leet' and 'secure' your crappy crypto for a rat is. Garbage like this should not be posted on this site.

Edit - here is the resource decrypted in a readable format since it was 'packed' via a binary writer:

jPowVEC.png

The protection used for this tool is DotRefiner made by Aveloy 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I see it's a shitty RAT program, and I guess atoms is right, or if we are both wrong ( o.O ) then show some documentation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...