TechX Posted May 2, 2017 Posted May 2, 2017 (edited) Difficulty : 8/10Language : C#Platform : WindowsOS Version : All (Requires .net 4.0)Packer / Protector : Crypto Description: Unpack the file, clean the code and keep the application working. and make a Short Tut for it. ScreenShot: Download Links https://hostr.co/4PgLTKiSB2Ms AntiCrash.rar Edited May 4, 2017 by Teddy Rogers
Teddy Rogers Posted May 3, 2017 Posted May 3, 2017 You will need to attach the file to the topic and format the text as per the examples shown, before this will be approved... Ted.
TechX Posted May 3, 2017 Author Posted May 3, 2017 6 hours ago, Teddy Rogers said: You will need to attach the file to the topic and format the text as per the examples shown, before this will be approved... Ted. How to Edit lol i cant see the "edit" here
Teddy Rogers Posted May 4, 2017 Posted May 4, 2017 Your edit time expired, I have done the work for you. Please follow the guidelines in future, thank you... Ted.
atom0s Posted May 4, 2017 Posted May 4, 2017 (edited) Unpack? This isn't really obfuscated at all outside of method names. The flow of the program is still all there and easily readable. The file loads, decrypts a resource which contains some basic strings. The main string showing config.txt being a file (which is missing in your rar) trying to be read. The file format is: array[0] = ? array[1] = ? array[2] = IP (local listen) array[3] = Port (local listen) array[4] = IP (remote connect) array[5] = Port (remote connect) array[6] = ? Each of these on their own line. This looks like beginning stages of a shitty RAT program. Given that you claim this a 'crypto' I'm going to assume you are from HackForums and want people to test how 'leet' and 'secure' your crappy crypto for a rat is. Garbage like this should not be posted on this site. Edit - here is the resource decrypted in a readable format since it was 'packed' via a binary writer: Edited May 4, 2017 by atom0s 1
TechX Posted May 5, 2017 Author Posted May 5, 2017 Unpack? This isn't really obfuscated at all outside of method names. The flow of the program is still all there and easily readable. The file loads, decrypts a resource which contains some basic strings. The main string showing config.txt being a file (which is missing in your rar) trying to be read. The file format is: array[0] = ? array[1] = ? array[2] = IP (local listen) array[3] = Port (local listen) array[4] = IP (remote connect) array[5] = Port (remote connect) array[6] = ? Each of these on their own line. This looks like beginning stages of a shitty RAT program. Given that you claim this a 'crypto' I'm going to assume you are from HackForums and want people to test how 'leet' and 'secure' your crappy crypto for a rat is. Garbage like this should not be posted on this site. Edit - here is the resource decrypted in a readable format since it was 'packed' via a binary writer: Its not a Rat man lol its a gateway to avoid crashing my server but thank you for answer
MindSystem Posted May 5, 2017 Posted May 5, 2017 Unpack? This isn't really obfuscated at all outside of method names. The flow of the program is still all there and easily readable. The file loads, decrypts a resource which contains some basic strings. The main string showing config.txt being a file (which is missing in your rar) trying to be read. The file format is: array[0] = ? array[1] = ? array[2] = IP (local listen) array[3] = Port (local listen) array[4] = IP (remote connect) array[5] = Port (remote connect) array[6] = ? Each of these on their own line. This looks like beginning stages of a shitty RAT program. Given that you claim this a 'crypto' I'm going to assume you are from HackForums and want people to test how 'leet' and 'secure' your crappy crypto for a rat is. Garbage like this should not be posted on this site. Edit - here is the resource decrypted in a readable format since it was 'packed' via a binary writer: The protection used for this tool is DotRefiner made by Aveloy 1
Mecanik Posted May 8, 2017 Posted May 8, 2017 From what I see it's a shitty RAT program, and I guess atoms is right, or if we are both wrong ( o.O ) then show some documentation.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now