Hey mate,

Please suggest me a best .net obfuscator in market which hard to decompile the source code.

Thanks

VMP for .net of course
then consider looking into EazFuscator

both have very strong features like virtualization as well as homomorhic encryption

Hey, if you're still looking for a .NET obfuscator, you might want to try Rika .NET.

It’s simple to use, works with modern .NET apps, and includes a solid virtualization feature that isn’t common in most of the obfuscators.

I’m actively working on it and always open to ideas or feedback.

You can find more info and join the community here:
Website

The problem with online obfuscator is you have to upload the source and pack it, i can’t see that working out well as most won’t want to put unprotected apps on a unknown system, it’s a serious security risk for an unknown 

VMProtect is well known and 1 of the most tested and I know there are private apps that defeat it easily, devirtualisation as well, take vmp 3.8 it had a memory leak and a couple of other problems, some of which were fixed in around v3.92 but not all

 

1 hour ago, H1TC43R said:

The problem with online obfuscator is you have to upload the source and pack it, i can’t see that working out well as most won’t want to put unprotected apps on a unknown system, it’s a serious security risk for an unknown 

VMProtect is well known and 1 of the most tested and I know there are private apps that defeat it easily, devirtualisation as well, take vmp 3.8 it had a memory leak and a couple of other problems, some of which were fixed in around v3.92 but not all

 

VMProtect 3.9x isn’t stable at all it’s extremely slow and way buggier than older versions.

Most other .NET obfuscators are pretty well-known, and there are tons of public and private tools to devirtualize/unpack them. Just using one because it’s popular means your software will keep getting targeted by reverse engineers.

Plus, you don’t have to use a remote system 'cause there are other ways to grab people's files if you actually aim that and have such intentions.

The only way to fully ease security worries is to have an obfuscator that works completely offline, no internet or server needed. It makes sense if customers don’t want their files uploaded, processed, and deleted on a server.

But on the flip side, are they okay with the fact that offline obfuscators get leaked or cracked pretty regularly sometimes every month?

I think that’s the real issue here.

Edited August 12Aug 12 by Fr0Mu

24 minutes ago, Fr0Mu said:

and deleted on a server.

it's a big big doubt

Just now, jackyjask said:

it's a big big doubt

Set your "doubts" aside or use some well-known one for $500 then watch its leaked version or deobfuscator pop up the next day, mate.

This is called free will.

2 hours ago, Fr0Mu said:

or use some well-known one for $500 then watch its leaked version or deobfuscator pop up the next day, mate.

It depends on how well you know how to use well-known protectors. 🙂

28 minutes ago, InvizCustos said:

It depends on how well you know how to use well-known protectors. 🙂

That's not how it works, unrelated..

On 5/25/2025 at 3:45 PM, Fr0Mu said:

You can find more info and join the community here:
Website

It doesn't even work...

Spoiler

 

Edited Tuesday at 08:54 PM5 days by InvizCustos

33 minutes ago, InvizCustos said:

It doesn't even work...

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

 

 

 

Use rikadotnet.com and try disabling your VPN/Proxy or similar stuff if you have one.

1 hour ago, Fr0Mu said:

Use rikadotnet.com and try disabling your VPN/Proxy or similar stuff if you have one.

 

Spoiler

All these obstacles do not contribute to the popularity of your obfuscator.

Edited Tuesday at 10:31 PM5 days by InvizCustos

12 minutes ago, InvizCustos said:

 

  Hide contents

All these obstacles do not contribute to the popularity of your obfuscator.

"Use rikadotnet.com" are you blind by any chance or what.

I just can't edit my previous message and my profile has that new link as well that's your lack of reading skills, sorry.

What is the problem with redirecting the previous domain to the new one?

4 minutes ago, InvizCustos said:

What is the problem with redirecting the previous domain to the new one?

I wanted to strengthen your reading and research skills, that's why.

Edited Tuesday at 11:13 PM5 days by Fr0Mu

With this approach to business, no one will use your product.
Unnecessary obstacles have been created for potential customers where they simply should not exist.
At the same time, other obfuscators do not encounter such obstacles.

10 minutes ago, InvizCustos said:

With this approach to business, no one will use your product.
Unnecessary obstacles have been created for potential customers where they simply should not exist.
At the same time, other obfuscators do not encounter such obstacles.

Whatever helps you sleep at night 😃