Rosan Posted November 30, 2018 Share Posted November 30, 2018 Which Obfucastor is better Appfuscator, ConfuserEx, Engima, .net Reactor, Themida. Link to comment
evlncrn8 Posted November 30, 2018 Share Posted November 30, 2018 (edited) sigh... see the search button.. use it.. first though, perhaps learn how to spell, otherwise the search will be useless Edited November 30, 2018 by evlncrn8 Link to comment
Rosan Posted November 30, 2018 Author Share Posted November 30, 2018 2 hours ago, Rosan said: Which Obfuscation is better Appfuscator, ConfuserEx, Engima, .net Reactor, Themida for C# Application, if ny have experienced idea, then please share it Link to comment
HostageOfCode Posted November 30, 2018 Share Posted November 30, 2018 Better convert your code to cpp and use Safengine or vmprotect or write a kernel driver and put your protection code there... 1 Link to comment
evlncrn8 Posted December 4, 2018 Share Posted December 4, 2018 sigh.. kernel driver indeed... which you'll then have to also pay for kernel driver signing cert, and / or have people enable test driver signing (good luck with that)... 1 Link to comment
Kurapica Posted December 4, 2018 Share Posted December 4, 2018 2019 ... These questions and similar topics should be a crime and directly sent to the trash bin, please people use the search functionality ! 1 1 Link to comment
HostageOfCode Posted December 4, 2018 Share Posted December 4, 2018 1 hour ago, evlncrn8 said: sigh.. kernel driver indeed... which you'll then have to also pay for kernel driver signing cert, and / or have people enable test driver signing (good luck with that)... Not necessary to pay for kernel driver signing there are many workarounds already... Link to comment
evlncrn8 Posted December 4, 2018 Share Posted December 4, 2018 yeh, and how many end users would you imagine would allow a protection to disable security on their machines in such a way ?... Link to comment
HostageOfCode Posted December 4, 2018 Share Posted December 4, 2018 20 minutes ago, evlncrn8 said: yeh, and how many end users would you imagine would allow a protection to disable security on their machines in such a way ?... Kernel driver can be installed on 64bit system without the need test mode to be activated or disabled driver signature enforcement. Workarounds are for normal 64bit system even with secureboot enabled. Link to comment
evlncrn8 Posted December 5, 2018 Share Posted December 5, 2018 like the nointegritychecks setting ? i'll try and be clearer.. how about, tell me a way to load an unsigned driver without having to use bcdedit or similar to alter system settings globally, that can lower the security of the system Link to comment
HostageOfCode Posted December 5, 2018 Share Posted December 5, 2018 18 hours ago, evlncrn8 said: yeh, and how many end users would you imagine would allow a protection to disable security on their machines in such a way ?... 4 hours ago, evlncrn8 said: like the nointegritychecks setting ? i'll try and be clearer.. how about, tell me a way to load an unsigned driver without having to use bcdedit or similar to alter system settings globally, that can lower the security of the system Its private info sorry. 1 Link to comment
evlncrn8 Posted December 5, 2018 Share Posted December 5, 2018 then i'll just assume you are talking out your rear end and dont have a clue what you are talking about then.. which is what i assumed from the start.. you are full of it Link to comment
HostageOfCode Posted December 7, 2018 Share Posted December 7, 2018 You are too rude but if you want so much send me a pm and will send you an example. Link to comment
evlncrn8 Posted December 7, 2018 Share Posted December 7, 2018 nope, if it was out there i'd have seen it.. and then if i wanted it so much, like you claim it exists, but you dont post here, but will show me an example in a pm (example?).. whats then to stop me posting it.. you make no sense, and sorry, i stand by what i said.. you're full of it Link to comment
XenocodeRCE Posted December 7, 2018 Share Posted December 7, 2018 Depending of what your software is doing, you can protect it without the need of any obfuscation tool Link to comment
er132 Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 (edited) Hi now vmprotect is support .net and thats fine for .net you can use vmprotect 3.4 its good at protection Edited September 17, 2019 by er132 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now