ViL Posted June 17, 2018 Posted June 17, 2018 helloo! may i ask which assembler is better suited for a < 4k intro for a 32 bits windows? = 3 thaanks beforehand! x3
Predator Posted June 17, 2018 Posted June 17, 2018 (edited) Winasm or Radasm for programming then I compile with masm or nasm Edited June 17, 2018 by Predator
ViL Posted June 18, 2018 Author Posted June 18, 2018 (edited) i've tried masm in the past and it was the one that has output the biggest .exe of what i've tried iirc tasm is a bit better size-wise and fasm even better the 0ok assembler (t0a) is the best one ive tried so far regarding size but i want to have a generalized picture to pick from Edited June 18, 2018 by ViLXDRYAD
ViL Posted June 20, 2018 Author Posted June 20, 2018 tried masm32 and i'm happy with the output so far, plus works in windows 95 and up, the upx unpacker do great for 4k and works in windows 95 too, thanks!
Peter Ferrie Posted July 6, 2018 Posted July 6, 2018 With TASM you can specify the alignment for the file which can reduce the size. The big .exe is probably because of default alignments. You can also hand-craft a well-defined .exe header with variables that you replace with final values. Or just use Crinkler to pack the result. 🙂
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now