Jump to content
Tuts 4 You

[crackme] CrackMe | .NET - Easy License Verification CrackMe


0xNOP

Recommended Posts

The [crackme] tag has been added to your topic title.

Please remember to follow and adhere to the topic title format - thankyou!

[This is an automated reply]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To get correct key need bruteforcing this sha512 hash - ee80f9ea10b32528514e163f18295c10d3deb4c9da82cd2cd740f2bbe560ebbe60478d66ca9660cbf981419c36df7b4de370b7660cd14e291e14729eb12a99b4

Unpacked & Patched

 

 

unpacked_cracked_with_dlls.rar

Edited by SHADOW_UA
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SHADOW_UA said:

To get correct key need bruteforcing this sha512 hash - ee80f9ea10b32528514e163f18295c10d3deb4c9da82cd2cd740f2bbe560ebbe60478d66ca9660cbf981419c36df7b4de370b7660cd14e291e14729eb12a99b4

Unpacked & Patched

 

 

unpacked_cracked_with_dlls.rar

Would love to see a video for this one if you are willing. Interested to see how you unpacked it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Me too unpacking is what i need to know,native has simple way to manual unpack but to manual unpack .net no proper tut is available :) n i knew pc-ret can unpack any net file but i dont know what stuff he does on that

We mostly guys r noob unpackers in net where only de4dot does the stuff :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, kao said:

It's very slightly modified ConfuserEx, so just don't be lazy and read existing tutorials (eg. ones by Ubbelol) and sources. 

Thanks for your comment

Edited by 0xNOP
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, SHADOW_UA said:

To get correct key need bruteforcing this sha512 hash - ee80f9ea10b32528514e163f18295c10d3deb4c9da82cd2cd740f2bbe560ebbe60478d66ca9660cbf981419c36df7b4de370b7660cd14e291e14729eb12a99b4

Unpacked & Patched

 

 

unpacked_cracked_with_dlls.rar

Thanks~! you're amazing :D

Do you think I could keep improving this version of the protector?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, kao said:

It's very slightly modified ConfuserEx, so just don't be lazy and read existing tutorials (eg. ones by Ubbelol) and sources. 

Just because 1 person made a tutorial on their own method of unpacking something does not mean others have not come up with different or better ways. Why is asking for any bit of sharing on this site always followed by "f**k off" type posts anymore.. 

Edited by atom0s
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could it be... because of the daily spam of "teach my how to unpack ConfuserEx" via forum posts, PMs and all other mediums? And by "teach" they mean "make pretty pictures and movie specifically for my target file, so I can just click on the buttons without any understanding what I'm doing."

I'm all for sharing - if I see that the other person is trying to learn. But if you're too lazy to even read and try existing tutorials, tools and approaches - that's not my fault, that's yours.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...