Jump to content
Tuts 4 You

[CrackMe/UnpackMe] 2 CrackMe - Confuser


CodeNatif

Recommended Posts

XenocodeRCE

xxjxTu5.png


 


Fxuogfc.png


 


You are selling every obfuscation for $10 ? Using an open-source MIT licenced obfuscator ? What's wrong with you ?


 


You should be banned ... that's not the philosophy of this forum, nor the philosophy of programmers nor even the philosophy of reverse-engineers


  • Like 1
Link to comment
CodeNatif

xxjxTu5.png

 

Fxuogfc.png

 

You are selling every obfuscation for $10 ? Using an open-source MIT licenced obfuscator ? What's wrong with you ?

 

You should be banned ... that's not the philosophy of this forum, nor the philosophy of programmers nor even the philosophy of reverse-engineers

I do what I want out of tuts4you and that is not the subject of this topic.

Link to comment
CodeNatif

Unpacked file

Good job, you have deobfuscate the CrackMe_NotPacked.exe , did you try to unpack the file CrackMe_Packed.exe ?

Link to comment
li0nsar3c00l

trowing different versions of confuser together, selling it and claiming it to be your own?


seriously dude, what the fornication is wrong with you?


  • Like 4
Link to comment

trowing different versions of confuser together, selling it and claiming it to be your own?

seriously dude, what the fornication is wrong with you?

I do not put confuser in my obfuscations services, I use a paid obfuscator and also another modded obfuscator for my services. the Obfuscation of this CrackMe is not the same as I propose in my shop, in any case it is not the subject of this post.

Link to comment
XenocodeRCE

I do not put confuser in my obfuscations services, I use a paid obfuscator and also another modded obfuscator for my services. the Obfuscation of this CrackMe is not the same as I propose in my shop, in any case it is not the subject of this post.

 

Its the same as the one you are providing in your Obfuscation service. Otherwise you wouldn't put the thread's link into the assembly.

 

You are wrong and you know it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Its the same as the one you are providing in your Obfuscation service. Otherwise you wouldn't put the thread's link into the assembly.

 

You are wrong and you know it.

the link is placed automatically by the confuser modded, I put this link in a modded confuser that I share, I did it only to make me advertising, I never use this confuser for my obfuscation services.

Link to comment
  • 1 month later...

So .... i arrived late here.


You take code from a free protector, modify a bit and recompile into another commercial protector claiming as your own?


 


As long i watched the discuss here you use this forum members as rats on the wheel to test your ideea of obfuscation on the assembly puting them here files as "unpackmes"....


 


I am wrong?


Link to comment

So .... i arrived late here.

You take code from a free protector, modify a bit and recompile into another commercial protector claiming as your own?

 

 

I clearly say that I use confuser for these two CrackMe.

 

wPFwj9d.png

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...