CodeExplorer Posted February 24, 2011 Posted February 24, 2011 Using RuntimeTypeHandles to improve Memory of .NET Apps/>http://www.bryancook.net/2009/07/runtimetypehandle-performance-memory.html
Killboy Posted February 24, 2011 Posted February 24, 2011 That's one of the many reasons I hate all crap .NETAlmost every C# programmer thinks hacking his way around the .NET Runtime is super cleverBig ****ing surprise when their neat little tricks stop working 2 major versions from now
CodeExplorer Posted February 24, 2011 Author Posted February 24, 2011 (edited) well .NET / Java are not fast - I won't build any bruteforce program on them even if saw this crap also ... Drilling into .NET Runtime microbenchmarks: 'typeof' optimizations/>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/vancem/archive/2006/10/01/779503.aspx />http://snipplr.com/view/29683/converting-methodinfo-into-a-delegate-instance-to-improve-performance/ Edited March 5, 2011 by CodeRipper
CodeExplorer Posted February 25, 2011 Author Posted February 25, 2011 I think that for best you should convert .NET to native how you do that on runtime JIT, NGen, and other Managed Code Generation Stuff/>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/clrcodegeneration/archive/2007/09/15/to-ngen-or-not-to-ngen.aspx
seriouslyrandom Posted March 2, 2011 Posted March 2, 2011 That's one of the many reasons I hate all crap .NETAlmost every C# programmer thinks hacking his way around the .NET Runtime is super cleverBig ****ing surprise when their neat little tricks stop working 2 major versions from nowI wouldn't necessarily call optimizing an application for memory and performance "crap". Shipping a working product is a feature too.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now