Da_Man Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 (edited) Thank you for this awesome app just a suggestion/feature request 1. support 24bit icon 2. Option to show method(s&R,filedrop) 1 fail if there is more than one method(s&R,filedrop) 3. About box, to show more information bout the patch,etc 4. Moar templates please, especially the back to nature by Ecliptic 5. For long app name, using the uPPP SkinHelper and set the APP: NONE, make the app name show up in the middle and it screwed the template because the long app name, is it possible to make the app name to show like the example? Example Appplication Name v.x.x Instead of Example Application Name v.x.x thanks btw hi to hagge and beldo Edited November 3, 2010 by Da_Man Link to comment
khaled_aqra Posted November 19, 2010 Share Posted November 19, 2010 Thank you my friend Link to comment
Ufo-Pu55y Posted November 20, 2010 Author Share Posted November 20, 2010 1. support 24bit iconI'm simply using WinAPI. If an icon doesn't come along like it should, then it's not my fault. 2. Option to show method(s&R,filedrop) 1 fail if there is more than one method(s&R,filedrop)I didn't get this one. Could you explain it for dummies again?3. About box, to show more information bout the patch,etcOne of the main ideas behind uPPP templates was having a scroller INSTEAD of an about box.4. Moar templates please, especially the back to nature by Ecliptic dito 5. For long app name, using the uPPP SkinHelper and set the APP: NONE, make the app name show up in the middle and it screwed the template because the long app name, is it possible to make the app name to show like the example? Example Appplication Name v.x.x Instead of Example Application Name v.x.x Sry, that's much too unpredictable.. really. For the coding and for the templates as well. Link to comment
mr sky Posted November 20, 2010 Share Posted November 20, 2010 I love your uPPP SkinHelper.exe .... thx man Link to comment
Specid Posted November 21, 2010 Share Posted November 21, 2010 awsome engine Ufo-Pu55y Link to comment
scorp Posted November 25, 2010 Share Posted November 25, 2010 wow this is awesome.but i cant see the fonts. is this in other language? Link to comment
Ufo-Pu55y Posted November 25, 2010 Author Share Posted November 25, 2010 which fonts? of the window/controls? gimme screenshot? Link to comment
PutterPlace Posted December 14, 2010 Share Posted December 14, 2010 (edited) I've been using uPPP for a very long time now. I didn't even notice the "packer" option until this release, but that's just my oversight really. Anyways, I seem to be having problems with the packer feature. I've tried setting it up for UPX as well as the included Upack, but the finished patch does not seem to actually get packed. The paths and arguments I've set are as follows: Upack Packer: G:\Patchers\uPPP v0.6\Packer\Upack.exe Args: * UPX Packer: G:\Patchers\uPPP v0.6\Packer\upx.exe Args: -9 * At first I thought it may have been because there is a space in the path directing to the packer executable, but I have the same results even if I place the packers in C:\. With the utilization of ProcMon, there was also no reference to the packer ever being executed when saving the patch. Is there something that I'm missing in regards to this feature? Edited December 14, 2010 by PutterPlace Link to comment
Ufo-Pu55y Posted December 14, 2010 Author Share Posted December 14, 2010 Hum.. but you're pressing 'Pack' in the small 'Patch successfully created!' dialog, right?If yes: doesn't the 'Execute' button do anything as well? Link to comment
PutterPlace Posted December 14, 2010 Share Posted December 14, 2010 I knew I must have been missing something. I'm retarded....it's working just fine. Link to comment
PutterPlace Posted December 17, 2010 Share Posted December 17, 2010 Ok....now this may seem like a strange question, but is there a way to specify multiple paths for dropping the same file? The reason I ask is because I'm working with a target right now that includes 4 different utilities which all utilize their own imports. The only file that needs to be patched in this case is one that the 4 utilities share, but each one has its own copy which is exactly the same. Normally I would just do an offset or SnR patch, but this is a java application which utilizes bytecode patching inside JAR files. Unfortunately the patches are significant enough to change a LOT of the recompiled JAR file. Link to comment
Ufo-Pu55y Posted December 17, 2010 Author Share Posted December 17, 2010 Nope, unfortunately there's no way atm to use the same resource for"filedrop"ing it multiple times, but I'll add it to the todo list.. Link to comment
ParanoiaR Posted December 18, 2010 Share Posted December 18, 2010 thanks bro....nice share..i need this programs to make a program patcher..^^ Link to comment
Hello EMO Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 you share open source? Link to comment
diablo2oo2 Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 hey ufo-pussy!why does the patcher require administrator rights?i know you need it for 64 Bit Registry Patching to run the 64 bit version of regedit.exe.but i see no other reason to run the patcher as admin.Wow64DisableWow64FsRedirection and Wow64RevertWow64FsRedirection do not need admin rights.maybe you should use'level="requireAdministrator"' only if there is a 64 Bit Patch in the project. else you should use 'level="asInvoker"'. Maybe some users will not trust a patcher which requests admin rights. Link to comment
Ufo-Pu55y Posted January 5, 2011 Author Share Posted January 5, 2011 hi, tbh I didn't think too much about it, when I added the manifest But right now I played for a while as restricted user on Win7x64. I couldn't do much at all over here with 'asInvoker' as level! -add registry value into HKCU - ok -add registry value into HKLM - fail -patch or drop file in non-system folder (desktop, etc...) - ok -patch or drop file in system folder (c:\, c:\windows, c:\program files, etc...) - fail I might be wrong, but imho in most use cases outside the patch would fail for a restricted user. But imho again there are use cases, when a patch even SHOULD come 'asInvoker' - namely when the patch is going to write stuff into HKCU for instance! With 'requireAdministrator' it would wrongly write it into the HKCU of the Admin. Gotta think about it one more time I guess Thx for notifying anyway! Link to comment
diablo2oo2 Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 i think in some cases the user should decide if the patcher should run with admin rights or not.i think i will build in a checkbox for the project ([x] run as administrator). Link to comment
Ufo-Pu55y Posted January 6, 2011 Author Share Posted January 6, 2011 Ya, I also think it's the best solution.. Link to comment
Caliber. Posted January 14, 2011 Share Posted January 14, 2011 you share open source?Why? Link to comment
quygia128 Posted February 13, 2011 Share Posted February 13, 2011 Thank you for sharing. Link to comment
Malaya2100 Posted March 6, 2011 Share Posted March 6, 2011 Wow, Awesome work for everyone. Thanks Brother for sharing. Link to comment
DimitarSerg Posted May 30, 2011 Share Posted May 30, 2011 Great tool !!!And thanks for uPPP helper.Now i create skins for patcher very easy and quickly. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now