CodeExplorer Posted January 30, 2015 Share Posted January 30, 2015 My ideea is to build a .NET packer,no good protection against reverse enginnering,but best optimizations and minim file size. Please vote! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ιvancιтooz Posted January 30, 2015 Share Posted January 30, 2015 Yes! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kao Posted January 30, 2015 Share Posted January 30, 2015 Only if you think that you'll learn something in the process. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CodeExplorer Posted January 30, 2015 Author Share Posted January 30, 2015 @kao:I already have one private .NET packer but is not good against reverse engineering. So probably I won't learn anything new!The purpose of my question was to ask peoples if they will use such simple .NET packer,or building it is useless! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kao Posted January 30, 2015 Share Posted January 30, 2015 Well, achieving great compression ratio in .net is harder than it seems. So, if you're into that algorithms, demoscene, "making every byte useful" and that kinda stuff, you could learn quite a few things.But I'm not sure people will actually use it much. We have Netz, Mpress and few more packers buf I haven't seen them being used in real life. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kurapica Posted January 30, 2015 Share Posted January 30, 2015 I think it will be useful to decompress the executable and embed the components. If you can add a feature like embedding not "Merging" the needed DLLs, I mean native AND managed DLLs , It will be a great project. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xSRTsect Posted January 30, 2015 Share Posted January 30, 2015 Demoscene and .NET dont match 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MindSystem Posted January 30, 2015 Share Posted January 30, 2015 I think it could be a good idea Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kurapica Posted January 30, 2015 Share Posted January 30, 2015 we can do great demo stuff with .NET, even 3D and openGL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kurapica Posted January 30, 2015 Share Posted January 30, 2015 12 lines of code : http://www.filedropper.com/demostuff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xSRTsect Posted January 31, 2015 Share Posted January 31, 2015 200kb for a spinning text with an outside dll does not prove your point kurapica. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kurapica Posted January 31, 2015 Share Posted January 31, 2015 It was just a quick sample, I could reduce that much more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dreamer Posted January 31, 2015 Share Posted January 31, 2015 build as match as you can we need tools Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derberux Posted January 31, 2015 Share Posted January 31, 2015 (edited) i think is a really bad idea to make a packer for the people, if you want make a packer would be better if keep it private for you, if you release a packer some guys will use it for protect malware and it will be detected by almost all antivirus like happens with Confuser Packer, anyway is just my opinion and you can do what you want, but i think is an stupid idea ask if the people want it because almost all of them will say yes. Edited January 31, 2015 by Alcatraz3222 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
udg Posted January 31, 2015 Share Posted January 31, 2015 (edited) you may spend your time for more important things like an .NET packer why not coding a "farbrausch v2m lib" in .NET ? requested by many ppl Edited January 31, 2015 by udg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CodeExplorer Posted March 2, 2015 Author Share Posted March 2, 2015 (edited) The problem with my packer is that some antivirus (like Avira) says it is infected with TR/Dropper.Gen (obviously false positive but still enoyning).http://www.codeplex.com/exepack suffer of the same problem. http://www.matcode.com/mpress.htm MPRESS is cool! No false positive detection.So my recommendation is to use MPRESS instead. Edited March 16, 2015 by CodeCracker 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PC-SISTEMI Posted March 15, 2015 Share Posted March 15, 2015 yes you have a very nice idea Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atom0s Posted March 19, 2015 Share Posted March 19, 2015 Would definitely be interesting to see a really good .NET packer. Regardless of the protection(s), if any, it would help a ton for applications that use a lot of graphics, or resource intensive things like WPF. A handful of my projects bundle all the required libraries into the files resources to be loaded from memory. The result is a nice and clean single file release, but that file can become rather large depending on what is used. It would be nice if there was a packer that could really shrink the size well. Interested to see if you do make a public one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattheig Posted March 19, 2015 Share Posted March 19, 2015 Yes, build it since it is useful Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MindLated Posted March 20, 2015 Share Posted March 20, 2015 good idea Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chickenbutt Posted March 27, 2015 Share Posted March 27, 2015 Demoscene and .NET dont match If 3DS scenes are than javascript and HTML5 canvas should be allowed.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mudlord Posted May 31, 2015 Share Posted May 31, 2015 And they are allowed. There has been a explosion in Javascript based productions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noob.exe Posted June 4, 2015 Share Posted June 4, 2015 I can agree with Alcatraz.If you will code and release a packer people will abuse it and probably use it to protect malware.Just look what happens to Confuser/ConfuserEx... Pretty much every .net virus/keylogger is packed bythe Confuser-Packer.So I would vote for no, if you develop one I personally would keep it private.Furthermore creating a "simple" packer is not really hard, people who are interested inthat topic will be able to code one for themselves to. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now