MaxX0r Posted August 23, 2014 Author Share Posted August 23, 2014 I had a busy week so I decided to leave it for the weekend, if I only knew how easy it was back then Thanks for the challenge... Good job also on this. I guess removing the nag was also no problem! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucleus Posted August 25, 2014 Share Posted August 25, 2014 @Maxx0r can you share with us source code of keygen? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mudlord Posted August 27, 2014 Share Posted August 27, 2014 Why do you complicate your life with ridiculous rules? There is no difference to use the ripped cryptocode inside or outside of the keygenme. It's like ripping whole the programm into my keygen. Goals are achieved. as I said the ways used for, does not matter. What you said does not apply to this keygenme. Show me where the real serial is stored No, no no no no no. it DOES matter how you do stuff. You are meant to learn something from doing keygenmes. Not just doing stuff for the sake of stuff. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GIV Posted August 28, 2014 Share Posted August 28, 2014 (edited) Self(auto) Keygen example: www.youtube.com/watch?v=XWbSM6iFDNE Edited August 28, 2014 by GIV Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kao Posted August 28, 2014 Share Posted August 28, 2014 Oh, come on guys, be nice to each other! From my post on RTN board: ..and KG for the gold: https://www.mediafire.com/?hs8woj55pigjb6u Since 95% of code is ripped from crackme, it will look really ugly in IDA/Olly. Sorry about that. njkermk did the almost the same thing, just didn't waste his time and energy copy-pasting code from original EXE to his keygen template. Is his work somehow less valuable? In that case, only ChOoKi has made a proper keygen - by understanding the entire algorithm and reimplementing it in the most efficient way. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GIV Posted August 28, 2014 Share Posted August 28, 2014 Oh, come on guys, be nice to each other! From my post on RTN board: njkermk did the almost the same thing, just didn't waste his time and energy copy-pasting code from original EXE to his keygen template. Is his work somehow less valuable? In that case, only ChOoKi has made a proper keygen - by understanding the entire algorithm and reimplementing it in the most efficient way. If i recall correct you say that a code ripping is a job that even a trained monkey can do. So why bother? The "real" keygen is the solution IMHO. Food for the brain. Sorry for little adding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kao Posted August 28, 2014 Share Posted August 28, 2014 Yes, I still think that ripping code is a task for trained monkey. So, I was disappointed about how MaxX0r implemented the serial check.. However, in this case, one had to apply lots of patches to the original code, as it was generating only one correct symbol at a time, checking for "-", etc. Therefore, I still think njkermk deserves some appreciation for his ingenuity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GIV Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 Sure.Great RESPECT to all who solved this keygenme. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now