Jump to content
Tuts 4 You


  1. kao


    Full Member+

    • Points


    • Content Count


  2. TobitoFatito


    Full Member

    • Points


    • Content Count


  3. CodeExplorer



    • Points


    • Content Count


  4. Teddy Rogers

    Teddy Rogers


    • Points


    • Content Count


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation since 06/05/2020 in all areas

  1. 13 points
    awesome_msil_Out.exe Approach: 1. Necrobit is a jit protection, so we use Simple MSIL Decryptor by CodeCracker , and it shall be ran on NetBox 2. Code virtualization is a relatively new feature of .net reactor, added in version Here is the approach i took (i did this about 6 months ago so my memory is kinda rusty ) : (Click spoiler to see hidden contents)
  2. 6 points
    I am referring to threads and posts like these: If a solution is selectively provided only to the OP by PM then it defeats the whole purpose of the Crackme/Unpackme section. In such cases, the solution provider should not even be acknowledged unless they provide working steps for everyone to learn from. This forum is a learning platform and if solution providers are expected to share the methodologies that they used for the solution. Here is yet another thread where the posts from the solution providers who gave vague steps was approved: Basically another thread containing "show-off" posts by the solution poster. Nothing practical provided and no proper steps were shown. I mean, take this for example (from this post): EXAMPLE 2 Basically useless. It's like saying that to climb the Himalayas one needs will-power, good training, a lof of good mountaineering tools, food packs etc and that one has to read up a lot of good manuals and practice on smaller mountains first... Only posts in the Challenges section which detail proper steps which are actually reproducible should be approved by the mods. OR... ALL POSTS there should be approved from anyone. Why just approve the "show-off" posts? Are we expected to "beg" the solution poster via PM for the steps? I am quite sure that my post may get deleted, since any posts which speak the truth seem to get selective get deleted these days, but nevertheless I wanted to bring up this point! Another example of an approved post where NO STEPS were provided:
  3. 4 points
    In my opinion that solution will be acceptable only if the tool used is public.
  4. 4 points
    This is really the key point that probably should be the requirement for a post to be accepted. A solution should be reproducible, not a list of private tools that are used. Private tools are, as their name implies, private, and by definition that means it is everything but reproducible (unless this tool is shared with the reader of the solution). The only person benefiting from such a reply is the respondent themselves in the form of an ego boost. Not very productive if you'd ask me.
  5. 4 points
    It's a really good question. The answer really depends. Let me give you few recent examples. Example #1: Extreme Coders names the tools and explains HOW to solve the crackme. A lot of effort is required but all the tools can be found via Google. So I have zero issues with the solution. Example #2: Prab names the tools but no explanation is given. "x86 retranslater" definitely cannot be found not on Google. "Clean control flow" tells the obvious thing but it doesn't explain HOW to do that. What's the point of such solution? The only thing reader will learn from this is that he needs a magic wand that he can't have.
  6. 4 points
    View File Reactor v6.3 Try to unpack or alternatively provide a serial. Protections used: Necrobit Antitampering Antidebug Obfuscation Code Virtualization + Shield with SNK Submitter whoknows Submitted 06/10/2020 Category UnPackMe (.NET)  
  7. 2 points
    you shouldn't be using WD in first place.
  8. 2 points
    Pawning 40 CTFs simultaneously
  9. 2 points
    My work machine has normally running MS Teams (2GB right there..), Outlook (250MB), Chrome with 40+ tabs (6+GB), Visual Studio, 1-2 VMware Guests and IDA. Would I expect it to magically work with 8GB of RAM? F*ck no! Sure, you can find a tool that hacks around and maybe reduces the symptoms. But it doesn't fix the problem. The actual problem is that your machine is severely under-powered for that sort of a workload. Another 8GB of RAM would be a proper way to solve those issues. And it costs ~40EUR - which is less than 1-2 hours of your time you probably spent googling for such "tool".
  10. 2 points
    https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.string.concat Get the next 50 elements and concat them, then repeat. If you want to add a delimiter for every text use Join instead. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.string.join?view=netcore-3.1#System_String_Join_System_String_System_String___ You should consider taking a programming course.
  11. 2 points
    I was facing the Same thing from long time. Here I've raised my Voice - that It makes no sense to upload Cleaned file or saying that I used de4dot modded Private bla bla bla. Some People are like, Read the Assembly language or see de4dot or VM and you will know. Oh Ghosh does it make any sense? No there's a no sense of saying this. Consider, Someone ask me How to Decrypt the encrypted Password? So Should I answer him Remember the Table of 2 to 30 or learn Counting and Alphabet. It's make no sense. Mostly Comments are like "I use My Private Tools" "I used modded de4dot" I used "Lamp of Aladdin" I used "Poseidon Trident 🔱" OH God, If You can't share or can't atleast explain little bit manual stuff, Then the Solution is utter nonsense and useless. I also think, We should allow solutions which actually are descriptive.
  12. 2 points
    Thanks to "Extreme Coders", I've never programmed in python before, but after reading all your public material and following the recommended steps in this thread I've been able to desofuscate the code. If they tell you how to do it you will understand it, but if they guide you and you have to discover how to do it you will learn martisor_unpacked.py
  13. 2 points
    Not necessary to unpack to get the key. Key: Steps :
  14. 1 point
    Also Windows Defender might have options to do live cloud verification or other levels of threat verification like generic heuristics. Is the web connection enabled in the VM and all Windows Defender settings the same? Virustotal style hash checking and stuff are becoming more common in antivirus apps lately for having access to a more up to date and broader database that allows vendors to find viruses earlier as well. Could even be some random spyware setting in your Windows account profile usually under the title of "help Microsoft improve our products and user experience" type of option. Or Windows Defender is so smart that it knows when you are in a VM or sandbox probably you are studying the viruses and do not want to block them. But doubt it
  15. 1 point
    Updates between Windows 10 machines are not always equal regardless of what date/version things say. They roll things out in batches and based on each devices hardware and other qualifying identifiers. Windows Defender symbols and definitions work in a similar manner. So both of your setups may show the same version of WD, but the definitions could be different as one of the machines probably hasn't gotten "permission" to obtain the latest stuff yet. That said, the detection difference could just be an updated difference in the definitions they pushed or that the way WD detected things was done in a different order. (Pretty sure their scanner does multi-threaded scans for performance purposes so one of the threads may have hit the other detection before another thread completed etc. and it just shows what was found first.)
  16. 1 point
    Hi guys, thanks for the feedback again.So this really sounds like hell to build any own client code without to build a browser engine to find out what kind of validation any xy site does request.So why is this validation so dynamic?Sound like that any server could also use any own request method XY instread GET / POST etc like GET_IT or whatever you know.All in all its just bad for me now so there are too much diffrent variables to handle and to know before.This just sucks. greetz
  17. 1 point
    https://www.infoq.com/news/2020/07/mandrel-graalvm/ @CodeExplorer -- bonus pavellaptev.github.io/web-dark-ages/
  18. 1 point
    10-12TB spinning drives only this year started to get to a reasonable $/GB ratio. So, 100TB+ SSD is way, way out of reach for the ordinary consumer. And it will be out of reach for next 5-10years. BTW, the f*ing original article was talking about tape drives, not HDDs or SSDs. Personally, I wouldn't call that a drive - but English is not my native language..
  19. 1 point
    Worlds largest SSD recorded so far is sitting at 100TB currently. From Nimbus Data, was a 3.5" bay drive running under SATA or SAS. Granted they reveled it back in 2018, and SSD tech has GREATLY improved since then, so I'm sure the other companies have larger stuff behind the scenes now and just haven't shown it yet. Most of the work being done on the drive market that we are seeing publicly right now is optimizations to the caching and storing of data on the chips and not so much in regards to chasing the larger sizes for the consumer market.
  20. 1 point
    CSRF tokens https://stackoverflow.com/a/33829607 https://www.hhutzler.de/blog/using-curl/ https://www.google.com/search?q=curl+login+with+CSRF -- On all modern login system there are 'validation' like this... What I have done in the past, is to use CefSharp library (or even the plain WebBrowser of .NET frm), load the page @ browser set the values to inputboxes and submit the form to the server by clicking the submit button by JS code. ex document.querySelector('.ovm-ClassificationBarButton-18'); restoreTAB.click();
  21. 1 point
    _PyEval_EvalFrameDefault executes a code object on the Python frame. To dump the code object to a file you need to use PyMarshal_WriteObjectToFile / PyMarshal_WriteObjectToString at an appropriate place within the function. DnSpy has nothing to do with Python. It's just a piece of string inserted there on purpose.
  22. 1 point
    truly, lost you... pasting some functions for GET/POST, maybe is helpful function make_post_request($url, $params, $json) { $curl = curl_init(); curl_setopt($curl, CURLOPT_URL, $url); curl_setopt($curl, CURLOPT_POST, true); if (!$json) { curl_setopt($curl, CURLOPT_POSTFIELDS, http_build_query($params)); } else { $params = json_encode($params); curl_setopt($curl, CURLOPT_POSTFIELDS, $params); curl_setopt($curl, CURLOPT_HTTPHEADER, array('Content-Type: application/json; charset=UTF-8', 'X-Accept: application/json')); } // display header // curl_setopt( $curl , CURLOPT_HEADER, 1 ) ; curl_setopt( $curl , CURLOPT_CUSTOMREQUEST , 'POST'); curl_setopt( $curl , CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYPEER , false ) ; // <-- u searching for this ? curl_setopt( $curl , CURLOPT_RETURNTRANSFER , true ) ; curl_setopt( $curl , CURLOPT_TIMEOUT , 5 ) ; $response = curl_exec($curl); // http status code // $status = curl_getinfo($c, CURLINFO_HTTP_CODE); // var_dump($status); curl_close($curl); return json_decode($response); } function make_get_request($url, $params) { $c = curl_init(); $url .= '?' . http_build_query($params); curl_setopt($c, CURLOPT_URL, $url); curl_setopt($c, CURLOPT_RETURNTRANSFER, true); // curl_setopt($c, CURLOPT_HEADER, true); /* curl_setopt($c, CURLOPT_FOLLOWLOCATION, true); curl_setopt($c, CURLINFO_HEADER_OUT, true);*/ curl_setopt($c, CURLOPT_HTTPHEADER, array('Content-Type: application/json')); $response = curl_exec($c); /* $status = curl_getinfo($c, CURLINFO_HTTP_CODE); var_dump($status);*/ curl_close($c); return json_decode($response); } once user login, store info to session variable at any page you can get any info stored. ex. ata login page $r is a recordset $_SESSION['mail'] = $_POST['email']; $_SESSION['u'] = $r['fullname']; $_SESSION['id'] = $r['user_id']; $_SESSION['level'] = $r['user_level_id']; then on any page, u can read the variable $_SESSION[??] //always u have to use @ the top @session_start(); what is the need? you are on HTTP and what ? ref curl w/o https : serverfault.com/a/469825
  23. 1 point
    Well it's true though right? Every OS upgrade adds more background services, more memory consumption. They always seek to maximally utilize the resources. You basically need a multi core with high RAM to do anything interesting nowadays. By forcing hardware upgrades, they sell more licenses so there is justification for this business strategy. My father told me in the 1970s these same things went on. So it's much older. They never rewrote the code to be more efficient because they wanted the system always busy so they could justify its use and further upgrades. Some things never change Does not leave us consumers with much options. As you correctly point out, tools like this are never as reliable or well understood as the OS choosing to be more efficient or flexible. To prove it further, Microsoft does not do much to stop Win10 cracks. But put a minimal Win10 with the bloat stripped out and they will DMCA it at light speed. Priorities! Instead of designing to run on certain hardware configurations as claimed, they in reality design it not to run on certain hardware specs.
  24. 1 point
    We say this with every iteration of Windows. Recalling XP being bloated... 🤔 Ted.
  25. 1 point
    Often servers have global settings and per domain or IP settings. So globally require SSL is on. But only the IPv4 address is configured for the redirect. The redirect should have been global possibly or defined also for the IPv6. Actually usually it's done on domain names which makes more sense. There are further tricks since SSL can validate IPs and there is some complexity to getting all this to work right in all scenarios such as shared certificates for multiple domains, etc.
  26. 1 point
    This site (in Chinese) explains a bit about that last parameter structure “The fourth parameter ppResult is a pointer of type PADDRINFOA, that is, a double pointer of type addrinfo” https://www.cnblogs.com/Ishore/p/4009205.html
  27. 1 point
    Seems like a tool to keep the cache empty. May be better to leave it to the OS to manage memory... Ted.
  28. 1 point
    part 2 https://hot3eed.github.io/2020/06/22/snap_p2_deobfuscation.html
  29. 1 point
    etc etc https://torrentfreak.com/removing-annoying-windows-10-features-is-a-dmca-violation-microsoft-says-200611/ cheers B
  30. 1 point
    Is everything going PRIVATE or knowledge stopped being shared ? Unpacking => Private ... Tutorials(Patching , keygens) ==> Private ... New techniques ==> Private ... knowledge ==> Private .. So what we left for the others for this Scene ?? The only thing that left is nothing some old books and old school techniques and nothing else... Why ?
  31. 1 point
    Bro i agree with your each word my full vote for you and also @BlackHat words also... I need to tell one thing for all if past reverse they don't let some revering learning sufft then new reverse will never born..
  32. 1 point
    https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/expiring-ssl-certs-expected-to-break-smart-tvs-fridges-and-iots/ bonus On Systemic Debt - hxxps://thedailywtf.com/articles/on-systemic-debt linux xrdp – an open source RDP server - hxxps://github.com/neutrinolabs/xrdp
  33. 1 point
    Thanks @Teddy Rogers I agree with you but posts saying things like "He shared the solution with me via PM" and such should not be approved. That way, anyone would not be able to show-off that they solved it. If they want their post(s) to be featured on the Challenge threads as having solved something, then the requirement should strictly be that they should post a solution that anyone would be able to replicate. If any special tools are required, then unless they are willing to share the tools, their post should not be accepted. That way, one would either have to post a proper solution along with the tools used or, if they do not want to share their tools, remain silent. I am sure that some would not want to share their tools but in that case they should not get the opportunity to make posts that just serve to boost their ego. If they are not willing to share their "private tools" that they used to arrive at the solution, then their solution (or even their post which just shows the final answer without the steps or tools) should not be approved at all. Otherwise, one could just say that they used a "private tool" for every crackme/unpackme (when in reality, they just used public tools), in order to avoid detailing the steps. So, unless they are willing to share the "private tools", it does make their answer any more useful to the rest of us. While we do not expect an essay or a full video tut of very detailed steps, a person with a reasonable knowledge of RE should be able to replicate the solution with the "steps" that they provide. For example, just saying that they used DnSpy and IL Spy to solve it would be rather useless... I would say that this is more like solving a trigonometry or an algebra problem back in high school where one is expected to provide the "steps" that they performed to arrive at the solution. One would be expected to provide just enough detail so that anyone reading it would be able to (reasonably) understand how to solve similar problem.
  34. 1 point
    As I mentioned in the same topic the solution that was posted was light in detail and never approved. Had it been approved it would have been considered a show off post. I can't force people to post acceptable solutions and I can't stop them sharing them via PM. Your other points are valid and I agree. I would like to get your opinion, if someone posted a solution that they used tool a then tool b is that solution still acceptable? Ted.
  35. 1 point
    @Prab Do you write some tools yourself? I think you can't clean this file just with these tools, such as: Does `Constants Decryptor` support `sizeof` instruction? Do you write tools yourself to convert `sizeof` to `ldc`?
  36. 1 point
    Unpacked! So here's what i did. Removing the antitamper is really difficult if you're going to decrypt the methods by executing the method decrypt call in <module>.cctor. I think this is caused by the function that modifies some parts of metadata. The function is placed before the method decrypt function and after PE section finding part. So what i did was i modified abugger's antitamper remover and it pretty much worked. After antitamper was removed, it somehow created an error when decompressing constant data. Anyways, im too lazy to find out how removing antitamper was causing that. I just executed the original file and grabbed the decompressed byte array value for constant and moved the initializer in <module>.cctor. After that, i resolved the values of mutations. If i remember, there were sizeof, convert.toint32, math.(function) and int/short.parse. After the mutations, all you need to do is to convert the fields to locals, calli to call, resolve the delegates, and resolve and remove the proxy call delegates. You have to make your own approach on removing the proxy call delegates on this one. The values of the delegates are initialized at <module>.cctor. here's the result of what i did. (manually cleaned junk types). Unpackme_cleaned.exe screenshot:
  37. 1 point
    asking me ? hope @Reza-HNA PM u.
  38. 1 point
    By seeing the number of imports on your screenshot and the ollydbg.exe in upper case i would guess you tried this on ollydbg v1.10, not on ollyv2 The description don't mention it here but that thing is for v2, if you look inside the readme of the archive, it says (in french) that the code has been rewrote for olly 2. So try with v2, or recompile the dll for v1. Also i'm checking the src and this can really be improved more. Especially for the v2 as if you rename ollydbg.exe to blabla.exe, then it will look for blabla.ini, but OllyPath2 will create only 'ollydbg.ini' as this string is in hard inside.
  39. 1 point
    without debugger detection awesome.vmp_nodbg.rar
  40. 1 point
    This forum is overrun by lazy-ass noobs who don't really want to learn. They want to have a youtube video and automagic tool for everything. Ready-made tools are private for this exact reason. People who want to learn will find the necessary information to learn the basics. And once you show you've done your homework, knowledge and techniques are being shared freely. Maybe not 100% public but via PMs and chat.
  41. 1 point
    I Released a way of patching these vm's, here https://github.com/TobitoFatitoNulled/Venturi77CallHijacker but you'll need to manually inject agile for now (will try to fix the issue asap tho.
  42. 1 point
    password: "viva la revolution" How the password verified? Here, check my entered password against the correct one, both encrypted. Obviously, the encrypted password at RVA 00011054 is 18 characters long. But, what is the encryption or decryption algorithm? Don't dive into that, instead I assume the algorithm is symmetrical. This time, I entered the right length password "123456789012345678". At entry of the subroutine, Ecx=004FF534, we can find the entered password at allocated buffer 008F0000: Copy and paste with the correct cipher password from RVA 00011054: 008F0000 12 EC C5 CB AC FC 86 96 23 7C 7D 57 46 5C 43 4F 008F0010 56 2D 2A 00 Run to the end of loop at 01323461, we got: 008F0000 12 76 69 76 61 20 6C 61 20 72 65 76 6F 6C 75 74 .viva la revolut 008F0010 69 6F 6E 00 ion.
  43. 1 point
    Hi everyone, Maybe some of you heard it already, but Sigma and I are working on an x32/x64 debugger for Windows for a few months now... The debugger currently has the following features: variables, currently command-based only basic calculations, can be used in the goto window and in the register edit window. Example: var*@401000+(.45^4A) software breakpoints (INT3, LONG INT3, UD2), currently command-only (just type 'bp addr') hardware breakpoints (access, write, execute), also command-only stepping (over, into, out, n instructions), can be done with buttons/shortcuts memory allocation/deallocation inside the debuggee quickly access API adresses (bp GetProcAddress) syntax highlighting, currently not customizable simple memory map (just addr+size+module+protection basically) The debugger has an easy GUI, for which we looked a lot at Olly Debug engine is TitanEngine, disassembler BeaEngine, icons are from various sources (see About dialog). We use QT for the GUI part. If you have a suggestion, a bug report, need more info, want to contribute, just post here or send me a private message. The latest public build + source can always be found on http://x64dbg.com (click 'Source'->'bin_public') to download the latest build. For now, you can also download the first 'alpha' here We would love to hear from you! Greetings, Mr. eXoDia & Sigma
  44. 1 point
    Beds Protector ? I found is Babel Protector .
  45. 1 point
    Run the program, put any fake password, click on "Check password" wrong msg will be prompted, open up process hacker, right click on the file process -> properties -> net module -> strings -> scan/dump and then you have a .txt file with all strings extracted from memory. Seek for the wrong msg prompt text and nearby is the password.
  46. 1 point
    my confuserex unpacker works for this with one slight modification in the anti tamper find method it fails just make it find anti tamper (easiest way just change the if (sections.Count == 3) from a 3 to a 2 this will then fix it and static route work 100%
  47. 1 point
    Yep. That is one of the sections. It may be more on larger files. BTW. Here is my script for recover VM'ed Enigma OEP. Is written back in 2015 and i don't know if is fail proof because i did not use/test for more than a year ago. // giv@reversing.ro // Script for restore VM OEP on Enigma 5.xx VM'ed OEP // Delphi files + VB6 bc lc bphwc bpmc dbh GMI eip, CODEBASE mov bazacod, $RESULT GMI eip, CODESIZE mov marimecod, $RESULT VAR INTRARE ask "Enter the EIP of the stolen OEP" mov INTRARE, $RESULT //mov INTRARE, 0041F372 BPHWS INTRARE erun bphwc INTRARE ask "Enter compiler type: 1 for Delphi 2 for Visual Basic 3 for C++" mov tipcompilator, $RESULT cmp $RESULT,1 ifeq jmp Delphi endif cmp $RESULT,2 ifeq jmp vb6 endif cmp $RESULT,3 ifeq jmp C_plus endif //Target compiler select mov delphi, 1 mov vb6, 0 mov cpp, 0 ///////////////// cmp delphi, 1 ifeq jmp Delphi endif cmp vb6, 1 ifeq jmp vb6 endif cmp cpp, 1 ifeq jmp C_plus endif Delphi: log "PUSH EBP" log "MOV EBP, ESP" log "ADD ESP, -10" BREAK: bc bphwc bpmc BPRM bazacod, marimecod erun cmp eip, INTRARE ifeq jmp BREAK endif cmp eip, bazacod+marimecod ifa jmp BREAK endif cmp eax, 01000000 ifa jmp DWORD endif cmp [eip], #FF25#, 2 ifeq jmp BREAK endif mov valoareeax, eax eval "MOV EAX, 00{valoareeax}" LOG $RESULT, "" eval "MOV ECX, 00{ecx}" log $RESULT, "" eval "MOV EDX, 00{edx}" log $RESULT, "" mov pozitie, eip eval "CALL 0{pozitie}" log $RESULT, "" GASIRE_RET: bpmc cmp [eip], #FF25#, 2 ifeq jmp BREAK endif find eip, #C3#, 5 mov adresagasitaret, $RESULT cmp adresagasitaret, 0 ifa bp adresagasitaret erun bc adresagasitaret esti gci eip, COMMAND mov stringoep, $RESULT scmpi stringoep, "PUSH 0x0", 4 cmp $RESULT, 0 ifa jmp Comanda_gci endif esti jmp Comanda_gci endif find eip, #5?C?#, 1500 mov adresagasitaret, $RESULT cmp adresagasitaret, 0 ifa mov diferenta, adresagasitaret-eip cmp diferenta, 35 ifb cmp [adresagasitaret], #5BC3#, 2 ifeq bpmc bp adresagasitaret erun esti esti jmp Comanda_gci endif cmp [adresagasitaret], #5DC2#, 2 ifeq bpmc bp adresagasitaret erun esti esti jmp Comanda_gci endif msg "Diferenta prea mica" endif mov adresacomparare, adresagasitaret add adresacomparare, 1 cmp [adresacomparare], #C3#,1 ifneq mov start, eip add start, 35 find start,#E8????????C3# bp $RESULT erun bc find eip, #5?C?# bp $RESULT erun bc esti esti jmp Comanda_gci //msg "Pauza C3" endif bp adresagasitaret erun bc adresagasitaret esti esti jmp Comanda_gci endif find eip, #5?5?5?5?C3#,500 bpmc mov adresagasitaret, $RESULT cmp adresagasitaret, 0 ifa bp adresagasitaret erun bc adresagasitaret esti esti jmp Comanda_gci endif cmp adresagasitaret, 0 Continuare_ret: bpmc ifa bp adresagasitaret bpmc erun endif bc adresagasitaret esti esti Comanda_gci: GCI eip, COMMAND mov comanda, $RESULT scmpi comanda, "PUSH 0x0", 4 ifneq jmp GASIRE_RET endif jmp BREAK DWORD: ///////// bc bphwc ///////// mov gasire, eax rev gasire mov gasire, $RESULT /////////////////// eval "{gasire}" mov gasire, $RESULT ////////////////// len gasire cmp $RESULT, 7 ifeq eval "0{gasire}" mov gasire, $RESULT jmp ansamblare_gasire endif len gasire cmp $RESULT, 6 ifeq eval "00{gasire}" mov gasire, $RESULT endif //log gasire, "" ansamblare_gasire: eval "#{gasire}#" mov gasire, $RESULT findmem gasire, bazacod mov adresa_p, $RESULT cmp adresa_p, 0 ifeq msg "Pointer negasit" pause endif ifa eval "MOV EAX, DWORD PTR[{adresa_p}]" log $RESULT, "" cmp ecx, 401000 ifa eval "MOV ECX, 00{ecx}" log $RESULT, "" endif cmp edx, 401000 ifa eval "MOV EDX, 00{edx}" log $RESULT, "" endif mov pozitie, eip eval "CALL 0{pozitie}" log $RESULT, "" jmp GASIRE_RET vb6: findmem #5642??21#, bazacod mov variabilapush, $RESULT cmp variabilapush,0 ifeq msg "Pattern not found for push value - VB6" jmp Sfarsit endif eval "PUSH 00{variabilapush}" LOG $RESULT, "" asm eip, $RESULT mov variabilacall, eip-6 eval "CALL 00{variabilacall}" LOG $RESULT, "" asm eip+5, $RESULT jmp Sfarsit C_plus: bc bphwc bpmc BPRM bazacod, marimecod erun MOV intrarecallc, eip EVAL "CALL {intrarecallc}" log $RESULT, "" ASM INTRARE, $RESULT bc bphwc bpmc rtr esti BPRM bazacod, marimecod erun MOV jmpc, eip EVAL "JMP {jmpc}" log $RESULT, "" ASM INTRARE+5, $RESULT jmp Sfarsit Sfarsit: msg "Script is finished"
  48. 1 point
    Hi, ok I have checked this file and bypassed also the password check. I also made a short script which does patch the ID & Pass check so that you get the file running as you can see on my picture below. ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// // // HWID Patch & Password Bypass Script // // Example Script for only this UnpackMe.... // // The Enigma Protector-4.3-X32 [patch HWID and unpackme] // // LCF-AT ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// bphwc bc alloc 1000 mov SECTION, $RESULT var ID_HOOK var PASS_HOOK var TEMP var AT exec push 0 call {GetModuleHandleA} ende add AT, 00FF2C05+eax add ID_HOOK, 000693D0+eax add PASS_HOOK, 00FE7FE6+eax bphws ID_HOOK esto bphwc mov [SECTION], #4134423746343232363343393832393846383145394335423136323133353445344538333836354500# mov [SECTION+29], #608BF850E80000000083F8280F850C000000B928000000BE0000EE01F3A461E9000000005E5B59595DC3# gpa "lstrlenA", "kernel32.dll" mov TEMP, $RESULT eval "call {TEMP}" asm SECTION+2D, $RESULT mov [SECTION+41], SECTION gci ID_HOOK, DESTINATION mov TEMP, $RESULT eval "jmp {TEMP}" asm SECTION+48, $RESULT add SECTION, 29 eval "jmp {SECTION}" asm ID_HOOK, $RESULT sub SECTION, 29 bphws PASS_HOOK bpgoto PASS_HOOK, PASS_HOOK_STOP //////////////////////////////// RUN: esto pause pause //////////////////////////////// PASS_HOOK_STOP: cmp [esp+14], AT jne RUN mov eip, SECTION+4D bphwc esto pause ret greetz
  • Newsletter

    Want to keep up to date with all our latest news and information?
    Sign Up
  • Create New...