Jump to content


- - - - -

Opera...


  • Please log in to reply
52 replies to this topic

#1 Teddy Rogers

Teddy Rogers

    Site Administrator

  • (Administrator)
  • 9,624 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Australia

Posted 16 June 2008 - 11:45 AM

Anyone who has used Opera for any length of time will know quite clearly that it is the best browser to have ever graced the planet (TiredFox users don't need to pipe in here :lol: ). To make things even better Opera recently had a version bump to 9.50. Unfortunately not everything is sweet...

Why-oh-why did they change the default skin to that horrid wanna-be-like-Vista looking monstrosity...  :cry:

Fortunately though someone was good enough to create a 9.50 skin to make it look like the previous versions. Add to that the fact Opera is even more whooping fast at browsing and viewing pages now, its Opera with rocket boosters :)

Does anyone actually like the new default skin?

Ted.

Posted Image
I would love to change the world, but they won't give me the source code...


#2 Loki

Loki

    In the Shadows :)

  • (Team Member+)
  • 3,592 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Behind you
  • Interests:Stuff. Lots and lots of stuff.

Posted 16 June 2008 - 11:53 AM

View PostTeddy Rogers, on Jun 16 2008, 12:45 PM, said:

(TiredFox users don't need to pipe in here :lol: ).

*Pipes in* Firefox 3 Final officially released tomorrow :)

Opera 9.5 does look good actually, especially with some of the new security features. (e.g. Opera distinguishes between local servers on localhost, intranet servers, and remote servers on the Internet. Local servers can use remote resources, but not vice versa.)

Still like the Firefox plugins like Webdeveloper, Tamper, Firebug, Hackbar and LiveHttpHeaders too much to consider switching though :P
Posted Image

If there's anyone near when we collide we throw them in the middle... they can pick sides. As the plans turn into compromise, the promises all turn to lies, the spite builds up and it can't get through, passive me agressive you. I know i nag, i moan i know... but with a plan like this it's way too slow. In the time it took to get this there i could have made this work, but all i had was the hope that pieces would take shape and we could watch them all fall into place.

#3 Ufo-Pu55y

Ufo-Pu55y

    *$&!§%#!!1

  • (Team Member)
  • 1,656 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 16 June 2008 - 12:52 PM

Uh ? Updated but missed that vista stuff, coz mine is skinned. But some details in the skin f* up with the update :\
Checked now.. Vista skin doesn't look that bad over here ? Not that I would use it..

Opera's my full time w*, but still no way w/o FF or IE sometimes. Loki knows why ^^
Posted Image

#4 STN

STN

    Member

  • (Full Member)
  • 77 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 25 June 2008 - 02:34 PM

ohh the new version is pretty cool. I used the old versions for a bit but they were a bit buggy so firefox was my friend. This 9.5 is more stable and indeed more faster. I am back to using Opera now :D .

I think you are right about the skins, the old one looked better but i am not complaining, i am happy with the performance :D

#5 zooley

zooley

    Member

  • (Full Member)
  • 73 posts

Posted 25 June 2008 - 03:17 PM

Happy to meet Opera fans overhere! :-)
I like better Opera then "TiredFox" ( :D ) even with those great plugins. I have to say that for me it doesn't look weird the new skin.
And the browsing speed is awesome!

Opera rulez!

#6 Ac

Ac

    Eng

  • (Full Member)
  • 33 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bacolod City
  • Interests:Darts<br />

Posted 26 June 2008 - 02:45 PM

View Postzooley, on Jun 25 2008, 11:17 PM, said:

the browsing speed is awesome!

How come my opera is so slow? and it has no progress bar.. :sad:

#7 Departure

Departure

    Addict

  • (Full Member)
  • 310 posts

Posted 27 June 2008 - 09:45 AM

Quote

How come my opera is so slow? and it has no progress bar..

Because your proberly looking at the bottom right hand corner??

Have a look at the top URL box to the right instead "Elements: 82/82"  <-- that give a nice status :)

Hmm I have'nt used Opera for nearly 10 years, SO yeah it has made some big improvments, I actually like its current release, thanks to this topic I decided to download it again. What I dont like is the limited options it has in it configuarations, for example when I right click a link and select open in new tab , I dont really want to set focus on the new tab but rather just open it and let me move over to new tab when im ready, It does seem faster than firefox, I can'nt say if its faster than explorer or not because I have'nt used explorer since version 6 , other than windows updates...
NASA lost a 125 million Mars orbiter because a Lockheed Martin engineering team used English units of measurement while the agency's team used the more conventional metric system for a key spacecraft operation.

#8 Ac

Ac

    Eng

  • (Full Member)
  • 33 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bacolod City
  • Interests:Darts<br />

Posted 27 June 2008 - 03:19 PM

hehe I'm used to the bottom corner... I see it now, but I dunno why my firefox runs a lot faster than Opera..

#9 ChupaChu

ChupaChu

    RE noob

  • (Full Member)
  • 466 posts

Posted 27 June 2008 - 08:10 PM

it acts strange on my pc from day-0.

Files i wanna download dont appear on the list until completely downloaded (i see network activity for several minutes so file gets downloaded - dunno where - its internal buffer i guess as in opera's temp folder no new file gets created), and then with amazing speeds (5mb/s etc) get "downloaded" at once (i guess writen do disk from a buffer).. this i could live with if after adding several files simunltanieously it would not crash the damn opera main process.

does anyone had similar issuess with "transfers" tab in 9.5 opera?
Have a nice day!

#10 Departure

Departure

    Addict

  • (Full Member)
  • 310 posts

Posted 28 June 2008 - 12:57 AM

hmm The transfer tab does'nt do that with me, As a matter of fact it gives real stats on the progress of the downloaded file, It also asks what folder I wish to save the file in before downloading
NASA lost a 125 million Mars orbiter because a Lockheed Martin engineering team used English units of measurement while the agency's team used the more conventional metric system for a key spacecraft operation.

#11 Teddy Rogers

Teddy Rogers

    Site Administrator

  • (Administrator)
  • 9,624 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Australia

Posted 28 June 2008 - 02:52 AM

View PostDeparture, on Jun 28 2008, 08:57 AM, said:

It also asks what folder I wish to save the file in before downloading

While it is waiting for this decision it also starts downloading the file, but to its temporary cache...

Ted.

Posted Image
I would love to change the world, but they won't give me the source code...


#12 ChupaChu

ChupaChu

    RE noob

  • (Full Member)
  • 466 posts

Posted 28 June 2008 - 12:46 PM

I got predefined download folder. Any option to switch in order to fix my problem?

p.s.
last version 9.2x worked perfectly.
Have a nice day!

#13 Departure

Departure

    Addict

  • (Full Member)
  • 310 posts

Posted 28 June 2008 - 04:27 PM

hmm maybe theres a difrence with international and US versions, I downloaded International
NASA lost a 125 million Mars orbiter because a Lockheed Martin engineering team used English units of measurement while the agency's team used the more conventional metric system for a key spacecraft operation.

#14 atom0s

atom0s

    Mega Poster

  • (Full Member)
  • 238 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:127.0.0.1
  • Interests:Computers; Programming; Forensic Science

Posted 29 June 2008 - 01:55 AM

I had tried using Opera in the past and just couldn't get used to it over Firefox from before.. with Firefox 3 out now though, I think I might be switching to Opera. There are so many downsides to FF3 over FF2 and it is very disappointing to see that there are more negatives then positives in my case.

The beta versions of Firefox 3 ran better then the full release for me, it's that bad.. Some things I have had issues with FF3 so far:
- Various memory leaks almost everytime I run it.
- Almost always gets stuck in memory for no reason.
- The new 'Awesome-Bar' is the most annoying thing ever created. And is not configurable or able to be replaced without plugins that do not work fully.

Those would be the most major issues I've had so far.. there's other small annoyances as well.

So I might be making the switch to Opera fully :s
C/C++ Programmer

#15 crackworld

crackworld

    Member

  • (Full Member)
  • 79 posts

Posted 09 August 2008 - 05:32 PM

Well yes i Alos find FireFox 3 bit annoying and resource intensive than FF2.
Actually, i hav  got a machine with less resources at hand like 512MB ram and a gigaHz processor
Upon running more than 6-7 tabs ... its is too slow to run,,uses up all processor :(

Well i tried  NEW Opera and its really GOOD, This new versions browsing  Speed is AMAzing..i really got amazed ..thou i m not that a  "SouOpera" Fan. :lol:
Its less resource intensive too

#16 Externalist

Externalist

    Member

  • (Full Member)
  • 57 posts

Posted 10 August 2008 - 09:35 AM

Opera's new 'quick search' is pretty nifty too. :)
When you only have a faint memory of an article/webpage you read a while ago, and can't remember the exact name/url or how to reach that page, just type in a few unique words or phrases in the article and opera will find the page for you in the history cache quickly and effectively.  ^_^

#17 Teddy Rogers

Teddy Rogers

    Site Administrator

  • (Administrator)
  • 9,624 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Australia

Posted 10 August 2008 - 11:21 AM

Opera 9.5x is absolutely great except for one of the most annoying bugs that prevents me from upgrading from Opera 9.27 on my main box...

Snap2.png

Why does this button in AdminCP never work and why do the developers never reply to my bug report? :(

Ted.

Posted Image
I would love to change the world, but they won't give me the source code...


#18 mia

mia

    Mega Poster

  • (Full Member)
  • 220 posts
  • Location:Gods Own Country

Posted 10 August 2008 - 06:51 PM

I tried opera 9.50 a few weeks a ago. Such a crap. How can they release a software without proper testing.  I had to go to my task manager every time to fully close that memory eater. Also i cannot go back to my previous version. For me opera is useful only to save files as .mht format.

mia...
Posted Image
1) I am Not a Cracker ..... Im only a Forum lover........................
2) Nobody is anybody's friend. Nobody is anybody's enemy. Its the circumstances that make friends & enemies.

#19 STN

STN

    Member

  • (Full Member)
  • 77 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 10 August 2008 - 09:37 PM

well i dont know why you guys got so many problems, it works superb here, in fact a lot faster than FF/IE. And memory usage, its usually 0 and with many tabs opened, goes upto 30/50% i think.

I am loving it :D

#20 Teddy Rogers

Teddy Rogers

    Site Administrator

  • (Administrator)
  • 9,624 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Australia

Posted 14 August 2008 - 02:22 PM

Yeah! They sort-of-fixed my bug in the latest 9.52 beta build... :thumbs:

Ted.

Posted Image
I would love to change the world, but they won't give me the source code...





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users